|USD Student Questions answered by Charles LiMandri|
|The ideal family in which to rear and nurture children consists of two biological parents in a harmonious marriage|
|Predators in Women’s Facilities|
|Unprotected: A Campus Psychiatrist Reveals How Political Correctness in Her Profession Endangers Every Studen|
|Gender Identity Policies in Schools: What Congress, the Courts, and the Trump Administration Should Do|
|Key Findings of Mark Regnerus' New Family Structure Study|
|Church Issues by Charles LiMandri - Audio and Video|
|Understanding the Transgender Phenomenon|
|Are we all ‘omnigender’ now?|
|cmf file 59 (2016) - gender dysphoria|
|Bible verses about homosexuality|
|The Institute of Catholic Culture|
|Sycamore Trust Resources|
|Talking Points: Transgender|
|The Health Hazards of Homosexuality - Book|
|Lies and Bullying from the Human Rights Campaign|
|HUMAN SEXUALITY POLICIES FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS (PDF)|
|The New Atlantis - Number 50 - Fall 2016 - Questions related to sexuality and gender -|
|HIV Among Transgender People|
|New Edition of The Newman Guide Makes Searching for Faithful Catholic Colleges Simpler Than Ever|
|MassResistance fundraising challenge re-energized by outstanding book offer on “homosexual parenting.”|
What follows below in blue are my responses to the questions in black that you sent me from the USD students I addressed a few weeks ago. I hope that they find the responses helpful. Thank you again for allowing me to participate in this important discussion. I wish you and your students the very best especially during this Easter season.
USD Class of 1977
1. Aren’t the studies that show a relationship between same-sex marriages and lower measures of success, or same-sex sex and higher rates of STI transmissions, showing correlation instead of causation? Could other reasons explain this, such as homophobic harassment by peers, families, and doctors?
studies that show that same-sex marriages have a lower measure of success,
or same sex behavior has higher rates of STD's can not be explaned
simply because of factors such as homohobic harrassment by peers and
families, etc. This is evidenced by the fact that even in societies
where homosexuality has been widely accepted for years, such as The
Netherlands and Sweden, there are similar high rates of negative effects
reulting from such relationships and behavior. See, e.g., http://www.cfcidaho.org/comparing-lifestyles-homosexual-couples-married-couples and http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/number-50-fall-2016.
Moreover, despite increasing acceptance in the United States, including the medical community, HIV rates among homosexuals has remained at dangerously high rates: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html.
2. Can you clarify what you meant by equating transgender people to pedophiles?
I did not intend to directly equate transgender people to pedophiles. Rather, I used as an example of the problems raised by allowing people to use opposite sex bathrooms and locker rooms the case of the transgender man at Evergreen State University in Washington. In that case, a 45-year old man has been exposing himself to girls as young as six years old who are there to use the public pool: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227562/Colleen-Francis-Outrage-transgendered-woman-permitted-use-college-womens-locker-room-exposing-himself.html; see also this link: http://www.lc.org/PDFs/LC-Predators-in-Bathrooms-Feb-2017-edited-2-17-17.pdf
3. In terms of the data you cited on children of same-sex couples not doing as well as children of heterosexual couplings, isn’t it quite possible that there seems to be a correlation that doesn’t necessarily denote causation? Same-sex couples are marginalized, excluded from the labor force and social sphere more than their heterosexual counterparts. Wouldn’t this have a major impact on these children, meaning their different experience is really based on our discriminating society rather than the sexual orientation of their parents?
The Study that I was citing took these societal effects into consideration, and they can not alone explain the significant adverse impacts on children of same-sex parenting compared to children being raised by their own biological parents whenever possible: http://www.focusonthefamily.com/about/focus-findings/family-formation-trends/regnerus-family-structures-study.
4. As the founder of Alumni for a Catholic USD, what advantages do you believe a Catholic USD has over other religions or a non-religious USD?
As a devout Catholic, I believe, as did the founders of USD, that students would benefit immeasurably from learning the Catholic faith. Of course, if one does not believe in God or objective truth, then they may see no benefit in a distinctly Catholic education. Even setting religion aside, however, it is noteworthy that a majority of the members of the U.S. Supreme Court received Catholic educations, including Justices Roberts, Alito, and Gorsuch. A Catholic education has historically been viewed as more academically rigorous, which should be no surprise as the Catholic Church invented the university system. Here is some significant facts which support the reasons why Catholic schools tend to be superior: https://ace.nd.edu/resources/catholic-school-facts.
5. Why do you think your data/arguments focused on homosexual men over women?
I focused more on men because there seems to be more data available on men and it is generally thought that sexual orientation in women tends to be more fluid than in men:
https://makeitbetter.net/better-you/sexual-fluidity-another-dimension-to-womens-sexuality/. However, even gay researchers are finding that sexual orientation in men is more fluid than once thought: http://alumniforacatholicusd.org/7-Lisa_Diamond.pdf.
6. Where do you stand on adoption? Are children better off in foster care than being adopted by a loving same-sex couple?
The official position of the Catholic Church is that there should not be legal recognition of same-sex couples and same-sex couples should not be permitted to adopt children:
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030731_homosexual-unions_en.html. Children are generally much better off if they have as role models both halves of humanity in the form of a mother and a father. Men and women parent differently and children benefit from those differences: http://www.focusonthefamily.com/socialissues/marriage/marriage/mom-and-dad-children-need-both.
7. If God created male and female individuals as the biologically perfect specimens, how would you explain intersex individuals? How would God explain this phenomenon?
Christians believe that God created men and women perfect but they brought sin into the world by disobeying God. As a result, there is suffering, including deseases and birth defects. Intersex individuals represent less than one percent of the population. This type of unfortunate abnormality should certainly not be the basis of a whole discipline of gender ideology. Rather, it is a condition like any other abnormality that needs to be treated with sensitivity and compassion. The goal should be to get the best possible result for the persons afflicted so that they can lead as normal a life as possible. The "Church Teaching" section of the website www.AlumniForACatholicUSD.org has a lot of good information about what Catholics and other Christians believe about what God intended for the expression of our human sexuality.
8. What is your stance on pansexuality and asexuality?
These terms are merely recent inventions to advance a political agenda. They bear no relation to what God intended when He created us in His image and likeness. Once again, without God, there is no objective measure of truth, goodness, or beauty, and no real hope of human fulfillment or happiness. Instead, there is disorder and anarchy, even in the expression of our sexuality, which is well reflected by such nonsensical terms as "pansexuality" and "asexuality". Human sexuality is a gift from God but like any gift it can be used as intended or abused. The choice is ours. The Church teaching on gender ideology can be found at these links: http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/marriage/promotion-and-defense-of-marriage/upload/Gender-Ideology-Select-Teaching-Resources.pdf and http://www.alumniforacatholicusd.org/contents/en-us/d1.html.
9. How did I know I was attracted to men as early as 5 or 6 years old with a strong malefigure, no sexual abuse, and no bullying?
Children as young as 5 or 6 years old can begin to appreciate their maleness and femaleness but it is usually not until adolescence that people start to think in terms of being sexually attracted to one or the other gender. The usual factors that homosexual men experience in their youth are a lack of a good relationship with their father, the influfence of a dominant mother, sexual or physical abuse, peer rejection or bullying, and a negative self image or envy of other males. Certainly not all homosexual men experience all of these factors, but it would be an exception for a homosexual male to experience none of them. Of course exceptions do occur and you may be one of them. Then again, some of these influences occur at ages even before age 5, when you may have been too young to appreciate or remember them. For more helpful information, I would recommend the websites of Catholic Courage: https://couragerc.org/ and the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity: https://therapeuticchoice.com/.